Published in

American Geophysical Union, Earth and Space Science, 8(10), 2023

DOI: 10.1029/2023ea002859

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Passive Microwave Radiometry at Different Frequency Bands for River Discharge Retrievals

Journal article published in 2023 by G. Robert Brakenridge ORCID, Son V. Nghiem ORCID, Zsofia Kugler ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Published version: archiving restricted
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractThe present era of climate change and expanding population requires major improvements in sustained observation of global river discharge. Floods and droughts are affecting food supplies, and suspected long‐term trends require appropriate data for evaluation. Orbital remote sensing can address this observational need. Here we use satellite Ka‐ (36.5 GHz) and L‐band (1–2 GHz) passive microwave radiometry (PMR) to monitor river discharge changes and determine what size rivers can be measured and the frequencies and polarization configurations that yield the most robust results. Selected satellite gauging reaches (SGRs) can be measured at near‐daily intervals from 1998 to present (Ka‐band) and 2010 to present (L‐band). The SGRs are 10–36 km in length; the dynamic proportion of water surface area within each varies with river discharge. Due to contrasting dielectric properties, water and land emit different intensities of microwave radiation; thus emission from a mixed water/land pixel decreases as the proportion of water within the pixel increases. Depending on the river and floodplain morphology, water flow area can be a robust indicator of discharge and the microwave sensors can retrieve daily discharge to ±20%. Instead of spatial resolution, it is the sensor measurement precision, geolocation accuracy, and channel and floodplain morphology that most strongly affect accuracy. Calibration of flow area signals to discharge can be performed using nearby ground stations (even if now discontinued) or by comparison to hydrologic modeling.