Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Oxford University Press, ICES Journal of Marine Science, 10(80), p. 2567-2578, 2023

DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsad089

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Adapting the sampling design of research surveys to improve the biomass estimation of secondary species—the case study of Raja clavata

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract Research surveys are important to evaluate fishery resources’ spatial distribution and abundance. Although the underlying sampling is usually conceived with a focus on specific species, efficient designs can also collect data on secondary species. We present a framework to explore and evaluate the adequacy of alternative sampling designs for fishery research surveys aiming to maximize accuracy estimates of the secondary species abundance while maintaining the quality of the abundance estimates of primary species. A geostatistical model-based approach was developed considering the semi-continuous nature of the data and the excess of zero values commonly observed for secondary species. New sampling designs were defined according to optimization weights and evaluated based on the resulting prediction exactness. The framework was applied to the bottom trawl survey conducted along the Portuguese continental coast with European hake, Merluccius merluccius, as the primary species and thornback ray, Raja clavata, as the secondary species. The sampling design URSI provided the best balance between the accuracy for both primary and secondary species. The methodology can be replicated for other bottom trawl research surveys and an extended set of species. We recommend that a decision on which sampling design to adopt in future surveys should consider a cost-efficiency analysis.