Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Wiley, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 3(92), p. 1177-1188, 2024

DOI: 10.1002/mrm.30096

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Anisotropy of T<sub>2</sub> and T<sub>1ρ</sub> relaxation time in articular cartilage at 3 T

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractPurposeThe anisotropy of R2 and R relaxation rates in articular cartilage contains information about the collagenous structure of the tissue. Here we determine and study the anisotropic and isotropic components of T2 and T relaxation parameters in articular cartilage with a clinical 3T MRI device. Furthermore, a visual representation of the topographical variation in anisotropy is given via anisotropy mapping.MethodsEight bovine stifle joints were imaged at 22 orientations with respect to the main magnetic field using T2, continuous‐wave (CW) T, and adiabatic T mapping sequences. Relaxation rates were separated into isotropic and anisotropic relaxation components using a previously established relaxation anisotropy model. Pixel‐wise anisotropy values were determined from the relaxation‐time maps using Michelson contrast.ResultsThe relaxation rates obtained from the samples displayed notable variation depending on the sample orientation, magnetization preparation, and cartilage layer. R2 demonstrated significant anisotropy, whereas CW‐R (300 Hz) and CW‐R (500 Hz) displayed a low degree of anisotropy. Adiabatic R was largely isotropic. In the deep cartilage regions, relaxation rates were generally faster and more anisotropic than in the cartilage closer to the tissue surface. The isotropic relaxation rate components were found to have similar values regardless of measurement sequence.ConclusionsThe fitted relaxation model for T2 and T demonstrated varying amounts anisotropy, depending on magnetization preparation, and studied the articular cartilage layer. Anisotropy mapping of full joints showed varying amounts of anisotropy depending on the quantitative MRI parameter and topographical location, and in the case of T2, showed systematic changes in anisotropy across cartilage depth.