Published in

Wiley, Journal of Computational Chemistry, 26(44), p. 2042-2057, 2023

DOI: 10.1002/jcc.27178

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Constant advance replicas method for locating minimum energy paths and transition states

Journal article published in 2023 by Zilin Song ORCID, Ye Ding ORCID, Jing Huang ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractThe chain‐of‐states (CoS) constant advance replicas (CAR) method and its climbing image variant (CI‐CAR) for locating minimum energy paths (MEPs) and transition states are reported. The CAR algorithm applies the Lagrange multiplier method for imposing holonomic constraints on a chain‐of‐replicas, aiming to maintain equal mass‐weighted/scaled root‐mean‐square (RMS) distances between the adjacent replicas by removing the sliding‐down displacements contributed by the potential gradients during path optimization. Two contextual regularization schemes with clear geometrical interpretations are implemented to jointly promote high convergence and numerical robustness of the CAR algorithm. We show that the constrained reaction path can be solved normally within 5 steps of Lagrange multiplier updates with remarkably high numerical precision via the CAR approach. The efficacy of the CAR methods is demonstrated by testing on multiple analytical, classical, and quantum mechanical transition paths: the Müller potential, the alanine dipeptide isomerization, the helix unwinding of the VIVITLVMLKKK 12‐mer peptide, and the Baker set of reactions. We also explore the potential of applying adaptive momentum (AdaM) optimizers for locating optimal transition paths under complex conformational changes. Most importantly, we discuss extensively the differences and connections between our newly proposed CAR methods and several related methods, with focuses on the reaction path with holonomic constraints (RPCons) approach of Brokaw et al. [J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2009, 5 (8), 2050–2061] and the state‐of‐the‐art string method (SM) of E et al. [J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126 (16), 164103]. The CAR approach represents a latest update to the general theoretical framework of reaction path finding algorithms in the two‐ended CoS regime.