Published in

Wiley, Journal of Neuroimaging, 5(33), p. 716-724, 2023

DOI: 10.1111/jon.13127

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Ghost infarct core: A systematic review of the frequency, magnitude, and variables of CT perfusion overestimation

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractBackground and PurposeCT perfusion (CTP) imaging is now widely used to select patients with large vessel occlusions for mechanical thrombectomy. Ghost infarct core (GIC) phenomenon has been coined to describe CTP core overestimation and has been investigated in several retrospective studies. Our aim is to review the frequency, magnitude, and variables associated with this phenomenon.MethodsA primary literature search resulted in eight studies documenting median time from symptom onset to CTP, median estimated core size, median final infarct volume, median core overestimation of the GIC population, recanalization rates, good outcomes, and collateral status for this systematic review.ResultsAll the studies investigated patients who underwent CTP within 6 hours of symptom onset, ranging from median times of 105 to 309 minutes. The frequency of core overestimation varied from 6% to 58.4%, while the median estimated ischemic core and final infarction volume ranged from 7 to 27 mL and 12 to 31 mL, respectively. The median core overestimation ranged from 3.6 to 30 mL with upper quartile ranges up to 58 mL. GIC was found to be a highly time‐and‐collateral‐dependent process that increases in frequency and magnitude as the time from symptom onset to imaging decreases and in the presence of poor collaterals.ConclusionsCTP ischemic core overestimation appears to be a relatively common phenomenon that is most frequent in patients with poor collaterals imaged within the acute time window. Early perfusion imaging should be interpreted with caution to prevent the inadvertent exclusion of patients from highly effective reperfusion therapies.