Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Wiley, Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 1(51), p. 86-96, 2023

DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13886

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Periodontitis is associated with airflow obstruction in the Malmö Offspring Dental Study

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractAimTo investigate the association between periodontitis and lung function in the Malmö Offspring Dental Study.Materials and MethodsIn all 1001 individuals (49.9% female, mean age: 44.6) from Malmö Offspring Dental Study were included. Periodontitis was assessed by a full‐mouth examination protocol including bleeding on probing and classified according to the American Academy of Periodontology/Center for Disease Control definitions. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) were expressed as absolute values and %predicted according to Global Lung Function Initiative reference values. FEV1, FVC and FEV1/FVC were analysed in relation to periodontal status using linear regression.ResultsSevere periodontitis was found in 7% of the population. Adjusted regression models showed significant associations between lung function and severe periodontitis with 2.1 unit lower FEV1/FVC ratio (95% CI: −3.91, –0.23) and odds ratio (adjusted) of 2.56 (95% CI: 1.40, 4.75, p = .003) for airflow obstruction (FEV1/FVC less than the lower limit of normal) if having severe periodontitis. Lower values of %predicted FEV1 and %predicted FVC, but not FEV1/FVC, were found in individuals with >25% bleeding on probing.ConclusionsSevere periodontitis was associated with lower FEV1/FVC ratio and airflow obstruction in the present cohort. More large‐scale prospective studies and intervention studies are required for a comprehensive evaluation.