Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

American Geophysical Union, Journal of Geophysical Research. Solid Earth, 11(128), 2023

DOI: 10.1029/2023jb027314

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Examining Infrasound Propagation at High Spatial Resolution Using a Nodal Seismic Array

Journal article published in 2023 by Liam Toney ORCID, David Fee ORCID, Brandon Schmandt ORCID, Jordan W. Bishop ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Published version: archiving restricted
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractInfrasound—acoustic waves in the atmosphere below 20 Hz—is a useful monitoring tool. Topography and atmospheric structure strongly control infrasound propagation, and at common source–receiver distances neither of these effects can be ignored when quantitative source constraints are sought. Detailed spatial measurements of the infrasound wavefield would inform propagation models and improve source estimates. However, the “large‐N” deployment strategy now well‐known in seismology has not yet been realized for infrasound studies. Here, we use the 900‐node seismic array from the 2014 Imaging Magma Under St. Helens (iMUSH) experiment as a proxy for a large‐N infrasound network, by leveraging acoustic–seismic coupled arrivals. The active‐source component of iMUSH consisted of 23 shallowly buried explosions around Mount Saint Helens volcano; these explosions produced epicentral infrasound recorded on the nodes. We find that the bulk presence of ground‐coupled infrasound on the nodes is controlled by wind noise and source–receiver distance, with observed arrivals for eight explosions. Explosions with the most extensive coupling produce complex spatial waveform patterns across the array. These patterns are related to both topographic and atmospheric propagation effects, as well as spatially variable site (coupling) effects. We compare our observations to simple topographic diffraction and high‐resolution wind advection models, and full‐wave numerical simulations. We find strong spatial correlations between (a) coupled arrival strength and modeled topographic obstruction and (b) coupled arrival time and along‐path winds. Our seismoacoustic analyses and results are applicable to other existing and future nodal seismic data sets and can expand the utility of such deployments.