Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Oxford University Press, RAS Techniques and Instruments, 1(3), p. 224-233, 2024

DOI: 10.1093/rasti/rzae015

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

The verification of periodicity with the use of recurrent neural networks

Journal article published in 2024 by N. Miller ORCID, P. W. Lucas ORCID, Y. Sun, Z. Guo, W. J. Cooper ORCID, C. Morris ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract The ability to automatically and robustly self-verify periodicity present in time-series astronomical data is becoming more important as data sets rapidly increase in size. The age of large astronomical surveys has rendered manual inspection of time-series data less practical. Previous efforts in generating a false alarm probability to verify the periodicity of stars have been aimed towards the analysis of a constructed periodogram. However, these methods feature correlations with features that do not pertain to periodicity, such as light-curve shape, slow trends, and stochastic variability. The common assumption that photometric errors are Gaussian and well determined is also a limitation of analytic methods. We present a novel machine learning based technique which directly analyses the phase-folded light curve for its false alarm probability. We show that the results of this method are largely insensitive to the shape of the light curve, and we establish minimum values for the number of data points and the amplitude to noise ratio.