AbstractThere is a variety of experimental and computational techniques available to explore protein dynamics, each presenting advantages and limitations. One promising experimental technique that is driving the development of computational methods is cryo‐electron microscopy (cryo‐EM). Cryo‐EM provides molecular‐level structural data and first estimates of conformational landscape from single particle analysis but cannot track real‐time protein dynamics and may contain uncertainties in atomic positions especially at highly dynamic regions. Molecular simulations offer atomic‐level insights into protein dynamics; however, their computing time requirements limit the conformational sampling accuracy, and it is often hard, to assess by full‐atomic simulations the cooperative movements of biological interest for large assemblies such as those resolved by cryo‐EM. Coarse‐grained (CG) simulations permit us to explore such systems, but at the costs of lower resolution and potentially incomplete sampling of conformational space. On the other hand, analytical methods may circumvent sampling limitations. In particular, elastic network models‐based normal mode analyses (ENM‐NMA) provide unique solutions for the complete mode spectra near equilibrium states, even for systems of megadaltons, and may thus deliver information on mechanisms of motions relevant to biological function. Yet, they lack atomic resolution as well as temporal information for non‐equilibrium systems. Given the complementary nature of these methods, the integration of molecular simulations and ENM‐NMA into hybrid methodologies has gained traction. This review presents the current state‐of‐the‐art in structure‐based computations and how they are helping us gain a deeper understanding of biological mechanisms, with emphasis on the development of hybrid methods accompanying the advances in cryo‐EM.This article is categorized under: Structure and Mechanism > Computational Biochemistry and Biophysics