Published in

American Heart Association, Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging, 9(16), 2023

DOI: 10.1161/circimaging.123.015324

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Feasibility of Simultaneous Quantification of Myocardial and Renal Perfusion With Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Given the central importance of cardiorenal interactions, mechanistic tools for evaluating cardiorenal physiology are needed. In the heart and kidneys, shared pathways of neurohormonal activation, hypertension, and vascular and interstitial fibrosis implicate the relevance of systemic vascular health. The availability of a long axial field of view positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) system enables simultaneous evaluation of cardiac and renal blood flow. METHODS: This study evaluated the feasibility of quantification of renal blood flow using data acquired during routine, clinically indicated 13 N-ammonia myocardial perfusion PET/CT. Dynamic PET image data were used to calculate renal blood flow. Reproducibility was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient among 3 independent readers. PET-derived renal blood flow was correlated with imaging and clinical parameters in the overall cohort and with histopathology in a small companion study of patients with a native kidney biopsy. RESULTS: Among 386 consecutive patients with myocardial perfusion PET/CT, 296 (76.7%) had evaluable images to quantify renal perfusion. PET quantification of renal blood flow was highly reproducible (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.98 [95% CI, 0.93–0.99]) and was correlated with the estimated glomerular filtration rate ( r =0.64; P <0.001). Compared across vascular beds, resting renal blood flow was correlated with maximal stress myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve (stress/rest myocardial blood flow), an integrated marker of endothelial health. In patients with kidney biopsy (n=12), resting PET renal blood flow was strongly negatively correlated with histological interstitial fibrosis ( r =−0.85; P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Renal blood flow can be reliably measured from cardiac 13 N-ammonia PET/CT and allows for simultaneous assessment of myocardial and renal perfusion, opening a potential novel avenue to interrogate the mechanisms of emerging therapies with overlapping cardiac and renal benefits.