Published in

Wiley, British Journal of Haematology, 3(201), p. 502-509, 2023

DOI: 10.1111/bjh.18644

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Are dynamic or fixed FDG‐PET measures of disease of greater prognostic value in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma undergoing autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation?

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

SummaryPositron emission tomography (PET) response assessment using the Deauville score has prognostic utility in relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) undergoing autologous stem‐cell transplantation (ASCT). Improved predictive methods are required to identify patients with poor outcomes who may be better considered for other salvage options. We investigated the prognostic value of mean tumour volume (MTV) and maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) at pre‐salvage and pre‐ASCT time‐points, and the quantitative changes between scans (∆MTV and ∆SUVmax). One hundred and twenty‐five patients with R/R DLBCL underwent salvage immunochemotherapy and ASCT: 80 patients had pre‐salvage PET and 90 had pre‐ASCT PET available. With a median follow‐up of 5.6 years, 5‐year progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 52% and 65%, respectively. For patients with PET‐positive residual disease after salvage therapy, pre‐ASCT MTV was a significant negative prognosticator for PFS (HR 1.19 per 100 ml, p < 0.001) and OS (HR 1.78 per 100 ml, p < 0.001). Similarly, pre‐ASCT SUVmax was negatively associated with PFS (HR 1.08, p < 0.001) and OS (HR 1.08, p < 0.001). Notably, pre‐salvage MTV and SUVmax and ∆MTV and ∆SUVmax were not associated with PFS or OS. In conclusion, pre‐ASCT MTV and SUVmax appear to be of greater predictive value than the degree of response. Potential application may exist for PET‐directed management of R/R DLBCL patients.