Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

American Astronomical Society, Astrophysical Journal, 2(968), p. 90, 2024

DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4344

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

HaloFlow. I. Neural Inference of Halo Mass from Galaxy Photometry and Morphology

Journal article published in 2024 by ChangHoon Hahn ORCID, Connor Bottrell ORCID, Khee-Gan Lee ORCID
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract We present HaloFlow, a new machine-learning approach for inferring the mass of host dark matter halos, M h , from the photometry and morphology of galaxies (https://github.com/changhoonhahn/haloflow/). HaloFlow uses simulation-based inference with normalizing flows to conduct rigorous Bayesian inference. It is trained on state-of-the-art synthetic galaxy images from Bottrell et al. that are constructed from the IllustrisTNG hydrodynamic simulation and include realistic effects of the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategy Program observations. We design HaloFlow to infer M h and stellar mass, M *, using grizy band magnitudes, morphological properties quantifying characteristic size, concentration and asymmetry, total measured satellite luminosity, and number of satellites. We demonstrate that HaloFlow infers accurate and unbiased posteriors of M h . Furthermore, we quantify the full information content in the photometric observations of galaxies in constraining M h . With magnitudes alone, we infer M h with σ log M h ∼ 0.115 and 0.182 dex for field and group galaxies. Including morphological properties significantly improves the precision of M h constraints, as does total satellite luminosity: σ log M h ∼ 0.095 and 0.132 dex. Compared to the standard approach using the stellar-to-halo mass relation, we improve M h constraints by ∼40%. In subsequent papers, we will validate and calibrate HaloFlow with galaxy–galaxy lensing measurements on real observational data.