Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

National Academy of Sciences, 2024

DOI: 10.48350/191349

National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 4(121), 2024

DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2309881120

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Extreme drought impacts have been underestimated in grasslands and shrublands globally

Journal article published in 2024 by Melinda D. Smith ORCID, Kate D. Wilkins, Martin C. Holdrege ORCID, Peter Wilfahrt, Scott L. Collins ORCID, Alan K. Knapp, Osvaldo E. Sala ORCID, Jeffrey S. Dukes ORCID, Richard P. Phillips, Laura Yahdjian ORCID, Laureano A. Gherardi, Timothy Ohlert, Claus Beier ORCID, Lauchlan H. Fraser ORCID, Anke Jentsch ORCID and other authors.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Climate change is increasing the frequency and severity of short-term (~1 y) drought events-the most common duration of drought-globally. Yet the impact of this intensification of drought on ecosystem functioning remains poorly resolved. This is due in part to the widely disparate approaches ecologists have employed to study drought, variation in the severity and duration of drought studied, and differences among ecosystems in vegetation, edaphic and climatic attributes that can mediate drought impacts. To overcome these problems and better identify the factors that modulate drought responses, we used a coordinated distributed experiment to quantify the impact of short-term drought on grassland and shrubland ecosystems. With a standardized approach, we imposed ~a single year of drought at 100 sites on six continents. Here we show that loss of a foundational ecosystem function-aboveground net primary production (ANPP)-was 60% greater at sites that experienced statistically extreme drought (1-in-100-y event) vs. those sites where drought was nominal (historically more common) in magnitude (35% vs. 21%, respectively). This reduction in a key carbon cycle process with a single year of extreme drought greatly exceeds previously reported losses for grasslands and shrublands. Our global experiment also revealed high variability in drought response but that relative reductions in ANPP were greater in drier ecosystems and those with fewer plant species. Overall, our results demonstrate with unprecedented rigor that the global impacts of projected increases in drought severity have been significantly underestimated and that drier and less diverse sites are likely to be most vulnerable to extreme drought.