BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Flow diversion (FD) for posterior circulation aneurysms, such as proximal posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) aneurysms, remains “off-label” and controversial. Although there are reports of using FD in the vertebral artery (VA) to treat PICA aneurysms, the differences between structural PICA-origin variants have not been explored. We analyzed PICA aneurysms treated with FD, assessed radiographic and clinical outcomes, and presented a novel classification of the PICA origin in relationship to aneurysm anatomy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of prospective data for intracranial aneurysms treated with FD at a major academic institution from 2013 to 2022. Proximal PICA aneurysms that underwent FD placement in the V4 segment of the vertebral artery were included for analysis. A literature review was performed on PubMed to evaluate previously published cases. The PICA origin was characterized by 4 distinct subtypes. Type 1 describes the PICA originating adjacent/separate to the aneurysm neck, Type 2 with the PICA originating from the aneurysm neck, Type 3 with the PICA originating from the aneurysm dome, and Type 4 (True PICA aneurysm) with the aneurysm located proximally on PICA, distal to the PICA-VA junction. RESULTS: Thirteen proximal PICA aneurysms were identified and included in the analysis. Patients were primarily female (76.9%), with a median age of 62 years. The aneurysm median maximum diameter was 5.8 mm. From the total sample (institutional and literature review cases), type 1 had a 100% complete and near-complete occlusion rate, type 2 had 75.0%, type 3 had 88.9%, and type 4 had 75%. The overall complete and near-complete occlusion rate was 83.3% (20/24). CONCLUSION: FD in the V4 VA segment is an effective way to treat proximal PICA aneurysms. Exploring the relationship between PICA origin is a helpful method in predicting occlusion rates for proximal PICA aneurysms and may lead to improved treatment considerations.