Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Society for Neuroscience, eNeuro, 5(11), p. ENEURO.0458-22.2023, 2024

DOI: 10.1523/eneuro.0458-22.2023

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Generalizing the Enhanced-Deep-Super-Resolution Neural Network to Brain MR Images: A Retrospective Study on the Cam-CAN Dataset

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The Enhanced-Deep-Super-Resolution (EDSR) model is a state-of-the-art convolutional neural network suitable for improving image spatial resolution. It was previously trained with general-purpose pictures and then, in this work, tested on biomedical magnetic resonance (MR) images, comparing the network outcomes with traditional up-sampling techniques. We explored possible changes in the model response when different MR sequences were analyzed. T1w and T2w MR brain images of 70 human healthy subjects (F:M, 40:30) from the Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN) repository were down-sampled and then up-sampled using EDSR model and BiCubic (BC) interpolation. Several reference metrics were used to quantitatively assess the performance of up-sampling operations (RMSE, pSNR, SSIM, and HFEN). Two-dimensional and three-dimensional reconstructions were evaluated. Different brain tissues were analyzed individually. The EDSR model was superior to BC interpolation on the selected metrics, both for two- and three- dimensional reconstructions. The reference metrics showed higher quality of EDSR over BC reconstructions for all the analyzed images, with a significant difference of all the criteria in T1w images and of the perception-based SSIM and HFEN in T2w images. The analysis per tissue highlights differences in EDSR performance related to the gray-level values, showing a relative lack of outperformance in reconstructing hyperintense areas. The EDSR model, trained on general-purpose images, better reconstructs MR T1w and T2w images than BC, without any retraining or fine-tuning. These results highlight the excellent generalization ability of the network and lead to possible applications on other MR measurements.