Published in

Wiley, European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 10(53), 2023

DOI: 10.1111/eci.14037

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Hypothesis‐free discovery of novel cancer predictors using machine learning

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundCancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and better understanding of the risk factors could enhance prevention.MethodsWe conducted a hypothesis‐free analysis combining machine learning and statistical approaches to identify cancer risk factors from 2828 potential predictors captured at baseline. There were 459,169 UK Biobank participants free from cancer at baseline and 48,671 new cancer cases during the 10‐year follow‐up. Logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, education, material deprivation, smoking, alcohol intake, body mass index and skin colour (as a proxy for sun sensitivity) were used for obtaining adjusted odds ratios, with continuous predictors presented using quintiles (Q).ResultsIn addition to smoking, older age and male sex, positively associating features included several anthropometric characteristics, whole body water mass, pulse, hypertension and biomarkers such as urinary microalbumin (Q5 vs. Q1 OR 1.16, 95% CI = 1.13–1.19), C‐reactive protein (Q5 vs. Q1 OR 1.20, 95% CI = 1.16–1.24) and red blood cell distribution width (Q5 vs. Q1 OR 1.18, 95% CI = 1.14–1.21), among others. High‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (Q5 vs. Q1 OR 0.84, 95% CI = 0.81–0.87) and albumin (Q5 vs. Q1 OR 0.84, 95% CI = 0.81–0.87) were inversely associated with cancer. In sex‐stratified analyses, higher testosterone increased the risk in females but not in males (Q5 vs. Q1 ORfemales 1.23, 95% CI = 1.17–1.30). Phosphate was associated with a lower risk in females but a higher risk in males (Q5 vs. Q1 ORfemales 0.94, 95% CI = 0.90–0.99 vs. ORmales 1.09, 95% CI 1.04–1.15).ConclusionsThis hypothesis‐free analysis suggests personal characteristics, metabolic biomarkers, physical measures and smoking as important predictors of cancer risk, with further studies needed to confirm causality and clinical relevance.