Published in

Wiley Open Access, FASEB Journal, 1(38), 2023

DOI: 10.1096/fj.202301335rr

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Characterization of the molecular mechanisms that govern anti‐Müllerian hormone synthesis and activity

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractThe roles of anti‐Müllerian hormone (AMH) continue to expand, from its discovery as a critical factor in sex determination, through its identification as a regulator of ovarian folliculogenesis, its use in fertility clinics as a measure of ovarian reserve, and its emerging role in hypothalamic–pituitary function. In light of these actions, AMH is considered an attractive therapeutic target to address diverse reproductive needs, including fertility preservation. Here, we set out to characterize the molecular mechanisms that govern AMH synthesis and activity. First, we enhanced the processing of the AMH precursor to >90% by introducing more efficient proprotein convertase cleavage sites (RKKR or ISSRKKRSVSS [SCUT]). Importantly, enhanced processing corresponded with a dramatic increase in secreted AMH activity. Next, based on species differences across the AMH type II receptor‐binding interface, we generated a series of human AMH variants and assessed bioactivity. AMHSCUT potency (EC50 4 ng/mL) was increased 5‐ or 10‐fold by incorporating Gln484Met/Leu535Thr (EC50 0.8 ng/mL) or Gln484Met/Gly533Ser (EC50 0.4 ng/mL) mutations, respectively. Furthermore, the Gln484Met/Leu535Thr double mutant displayed enhanced efficacy, relative to AMHSCUT. Finally, we identified residues within the wrist pre‐helix of AMH (Trp494, Gln496, Ser497, and Asp498) that likely mediate type I receptor binding. Mutagenesis of these residues generated gain‐ (Trp494Phe or Gln496Leu) or loss‐ (Ser497Ala) of function AMH variants. Surprisingly, combining activating type I and type II receptor mutations only led to modest additive increases in AMH potency/efficacy. Our study is the first to characterize AMH residues involved in type I receptor binding and suggests a step‐wise receptor‐complex assembly mechanism, in which enhancement in the affinity of the ligand for either receptor can increase AMH activity beyond the natural level.