Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Wiley, Advanced Functional Materials, 14(34), 2023

DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202312822

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Face‐on Orientation Matches Vertical Organic Electrochemical Transistors for High Transconductance and Superior Non‐Volatility

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractThe recently developed vertical structure of organic electrochemical transistors (OECTs) can integrate volatile and non‐volatile functions into one reconfigurable device, making it highly promising. However, comparing with the conventional planar OECT (c‐OECT), the understanding of vertical OECT (v‐OECT) working principles and device engineering strategies is still lacking, impeding rational optimization. Since a major difference between c‐ and v‐OECTs is their charge transport directionality, which is highly influenced by crystallite orientations, the orientation–device structure match thus becomes an important yet outstanding topic for OECTs. Herein, using an n‐type small molecule IDIC‐MEG, investigate how much impact such match can have on OECT performance. The IDIC‐MEG c‐OECT fails to work due to the seriously hindered in‐plane electron transport by face‐on orientation. Surprisingly, simply changing the device structure from planar to vertical allows the resultant v‐OECT to exhibit the highest reported transconductance (46.3 mS) among all small‐molecule OECTs, thanks to the match between face‐on orientation and the vertical structure. Such match also leads to excellent non‐volatility, including highly predictable programmability and good operational stability. This work, for the first time, explicitly demonstrates the significance of orientation–device structure match for OECT optimization, establishing new guidelines for achieving high‐performance volatile and non‐volatile OECTs.