Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Oxford University Press, Brain Communications, 3(6), 2024

DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae123

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

An attentional and working memory theory of hallucination vulnerability in frontotemporal dementia

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract The rate and prevalence of hallucinations in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia is well established. The mechanisms for underlying vulnerability however are the least well described in FTD compared with other neuropsychiatric conditions, despite the presence of these features significantly complicating the diagnostic process. As such, this present study aimed to provide a detailed characterization of the neural, cognitive and behavioural profile associated with a predisposition to hallucinatory experiences in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia. In total, 153 patients with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia were recruited sequentially for this study. A group of patients with well characterized hallucinations and good-quality volumetric MRI scans (n = 23) were genetically and demographically matched to a group without hallucinations (n = 23) and a healthy control cohort (n = 23). All patients were assessed at their initial visit by means of a detailed clinical interview, a comprehensive battery of neuropsychological tests and MRI. Data were analysed according to three levels: (i) the relationship between neural structures, cognition, behaviour and hallucinations in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia; (ii) the impact of the C9orf72 expansion; and (iii) hallucination subtype on expression of hallucinations. Basic and complex attentional (including divided attention and working memory) and visual function measures differed between groups (all P < 0.001) with hallucinators demonstrating poorer performance, along with evidence of structural changes centred on the prefrontal cortex, caudate and cerebellum (corrected for False Discovery Rate at P < 0.05 with a cluster threshold of 100 contiguous voxels). Attentional processes were also implicated in C9orf72 carriers with hallucinations with structural changes selectively involving the thalamus. Patients with visual hallucinations in isolation showed a similar pattern with emphasis on cerebellar atrophy. Our findings provided novel insights that attentional and visual function subsystems and related distributed brain structures are implicated in the generation of hallucinations in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia, that dissociate across C9orf72, sporadic behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia and for the visual subtype of hallucinations. This loading on attentional and working memory measures is in line with current mechanistic models of hallucinations that frequently suggest a failure of integration of cognitive and perceptual processes. We therefore propose a novel cognitive and neural model for hallucination predisposition in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia that aligns with a transdiagnostic model for hallucinations across neurodegeneration and psychiatry.