Published in

EDP Sciences, Astronomy & Astrophysics, (678), p. A153, 2023

DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346919

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Quantifying the energy balance between the turbulent ionised gas and young stars

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Context. Stellar feedback is a key contributor to the morphology and dynamics of the interstellar medium in star-forming galaxies. In particular, energy and momentum input from massive stars can drive the turbulent motions in the gas, but the dominance and efficiency of this process are unclear. The study of ionised superbubbles enables quantitative constraints to be placed on the energetics of stellar feedback. Aims. We directly compare the kinetic energy of expanding superbubbles and the turbulent motions in the interstellar medium with the mechanical energy deposited by massive stars in the form of winds and supernovae. With such a comparison, we aim to determine whether the stellar feedback is responsible for the observed turbulent motions and to quantify the fraction of mechanical energy retained in the superbubbles. Methods. We investigated the ionised gas morphology, excitation properties, and kinematics in 19 nearby star-forming galaxies from the PHANGS-MUSE survey. Based on the distribution of the flux and velocity dispersion in the Hα line, we selected 1484 regions of locally elevated velocity dispersion (σ(Hα) > 45 km s−1), including at least 171 expanding superbubbles. We analysed these regions and related their properties to those of the young stellar associations and star clusters identified in PHANGS-HST data. Results. We find a good correlation between the kinetic energy of the ionised gas and the total mechanical energy input from supernovae and stellar winds from the stellar associations. At the same time, the contribution of mechanical energy injected by the supernovae alone is not sufficient to explain the measured kinetic energy of the ionised gas, which implies that pre-supernova feedback in the form of radiation and thermal pressure as well as winds is necessary. We find that the gas kinetic energy decreases with metallicity for our sample covering Z = 0.5 − 1.0 Z, reflecting the lower impact of stellar feedback. For the sample of well-resolved superbubbles, we find that about 40% of the young stellar associations are preferentially located in their rims. We also find a slightly higher (by ∼15%) fraction of the youngest (< 3 Myr) stellar associations in the rims of the superbubbles than in the centres and the opposite trend for older associations, which implies possible propagation or triggering of star formation. Conclusions. Stellar feedback is the dominant source for powering the ionised gas in regions of locally (on a 50–500 pc scale) elevated velocity dispersion, with a typical coupling efficiency of 10 − 20%. Accounting for pre-supernovae feedback is required to set up the energy balance between gas and stars.