Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Wiley, Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 6(53), p. 922-939, 2023

DOI: 10.1111/sltb.12993

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Examination of proinflammatory activity as a moderator of the relation between momentary interpersonal stress and suicidal ideation

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionPeer‐related interpersonal stress can increase risk for suicidal thoughts among adolescents and young adults. However, not all individuals who undergo peer‐related interpersonal stressors experience suicidal thoughts. Heightened proinflammatory activity is one factor that may amplify the relation between interpersonal stress and suicidal thinking.MethodsThis pilot study examined the relation between interpersonal stress and suicidal ideation in real time, as well as whether proinflammatory cytokine (IL‐6 and TNF‐α) activity across a laboratory social stressor moderated this association in a sample of 42 emerging adults with recent suicidal ideation. Participants completed 28 days of 6×/daily ecological momentary assessment that assessed for suicidal ideation (presence vs. absence, ideation intensity), occurrence of negative peer events, and feelings of exclusion.ResultsThere was a trend for within‐person increases in feelings of exclusion to be associated with increases in concurrent suicidal ideation intensity. Additionally, within‐person increases in negative peer events were associated with increased odds of subsequent suicidal ideation among individuals with very low IL‐6 activity. However, this finding is considered preliminary.ConclusionInterventions targeting perceptions of exclusion and increasing social support may be of benefit. However, findings require replication in larger samples, and thus must be interpreted with caution.