Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Wiley, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 10(37), p. 2080-2089, 2023

DOI: 10.1111/jdv.19253

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Reliable and rapid identification of terbinafine resistance in dermatophytic nail and skin infections

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundFungal infections are the most frequent dermatoses. The gold standard treatment for dermatophytosis is the squalene epoxidase (SQLE) inhibitor terbinafine. Pathogenic dermatophytes resistant to terbinafine are an emerging global threat. Here, we determine the proportion of resistant fungal skin infections, analyse the molecular mechanisms of terbinafine resistance, and validate a method for its reliable rapid identification.MethodsBetween 2013 and 2021, we screened 5634 consecutively isolated Trichophyton for antifungal resistance determined by hyphal growth on Sabouraud dextrose agar medium containing 0.2 μg/mL terbinafine. All Trichophyton isolates with preserved growth capacity in the presence of terbinafine underwent SQLE sequencing. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined by the broth microdilution method.ResultsOver an 8‐year period, the proportion of fungal skin infections resistant to terbinafine increased from 0.63% in 2013 to 1.3% in 2021. Our routine phenotypic in vitro screening analysis identified 0.83% (n = 47/5634) of Trichophyton strains with in vitro terbinafine resistance. Molecular screening detected a mutation in the SQLE in all cases. Mutations L393F, L393S, F397L, F397I, F397V, Q408K, F415I, F415S, F415V, H440Y, or A398A399G400 deletion were detected in Trichophyton rubrum. Mutations L393F and F397L were the most frequent. In contrast, all mutations detected in T. mentagrophytes/T. interdigitale complex strains were F397L, except for one strain with L393S. All 47 strains featured significantly higher MICs than terbinafine‐sensitive controls. The mutation‐related range of MICs varied between 0.004 and 16.0 μg/mL, with MIC as low as 0.015 μg/mL conferring clinical resistance to standard terbinafine dosing.ConclusionsBased on our data, we propose MIC of 0.015 μg/mL as a minimum breakpoint for predicting clinically relevant terbinafine treatment failure to standard oral dosing for dermatophyte infections. We further propose growth on Sabouraud dextrose agar medium containing 0.2 μg/mL terbinafine and SQLE sequencing as fungal sporulation‐independent methods for rapid and reliable detection of terbinafine resistance.