Published in

Springer, Aquatic Sciences - Research Across Boundaries, 3(85), 2023

DOI: 10.1007/s00027-023-00976-6

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Do stable carbon and nitrogen isotope values of Nitella flexilis differ between softwater and hardwater lakes?

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractThe composition of stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes (δ13C and δ15N) is widely used for tracking the origin of organic matter (OM) present in lacustrine sediments. These isotopes also define the evolution of OM in food web loops. Charophyte species Nitella flexilis C. Agardh, 1824 can be found in different aquatic environments where it contributes significantly to sediment formation and influences biota function. Therefore, it is crucial to study more about δ13C and δ15N in different lake types. Here, we present the results of the first comprehensive study of N. flexilis δ13C and δ15N, which add to the knowledge of the C and N isotope records of charophytes. We obtained the δ13C and δ15N records of N. flexilis OM from hardwater and softwater lakes and checked for differences between these records. We also analyzed the differences in physical and chemical parameters. Finally, we compared the δ13C and δ15N records with physical and chemical parameters to identify the variables that have the highest influence on N. flexilis δ13C and δ15N values. Our study showed that both δ13C and δ15N did not differ significantly in the two types of lakes, although the lakes had significant differences in several physical and chemical parameters (pH, Ca2+, dissolved inorganic carbon, total phosphorus, conductivity). However, we observed that δ13C values were influenced by light conditions (photosynthetic active radiation, depth, dissolved OM), while δ15N values were influenced by the total nitrogen concentration in water.