Published in

Wiley, Muscle & Nerve, 3(68), p. 308-315, 2023

DOI: 10.1002/mus.27925

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Optimizing examination time and diagnostic performance of the histamine‐induced axon‐reflex flare response in diabetes

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractIntroduction/AimsThe axon‐reflex flare response is a reliable method for functional assessment of small fibers in diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), but broad adoption is limited by the time requirement. The aims of this study were to (1) assess diagnostic performance and optimize time required for assessing the histamine‐induced flare response and (2) associate with established parameters.MethodsA total of 60 participants with type 1 diabetes with (n = 33) or without (n = 27) DPN participated. The participants underwent quantitative sensory testing (QST), corneal confocal microscopy (CCM), and flare intensity and area size assessments by laser‐Doppler imaging (FLPI) following an epidermal skin‐prick application of histamine. The flare parameters were evaluated each minute for 15 min, and the diagnostic performance compared to QST and CCM were assessed using area under the curve (AUC). Minimum time‐requirements until differentiation and to achieve results comparable with a full examination were assessed.ResultsFlare area size had better diagnostic performance compared with CCM (AUC 0.88 vs. 0.77, p < 0.01) and QST (AUC 0.91 vs. 0.81, p = 0.02) than mean flare intensity, and could distinguish people with and without DPN after 4 min compared to after 6 min (both p < 0.01). Flare area size achieved a diagnostic performance comparable to a full examination after 6 and 7 min (CCM and QST respectively, p > 0.05), while mean flare intensity achieved it after 5 and 8 min (CCM and QST respectively, p > 0.05).DiscussionThe flare area size can be evaluated 6–7 min after histamine‐application, which increases diagnostic performance compared to mean flare intensity.