Published in

Oxford University Press, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 3(530), p. 2810-2821, 2024

DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stae1026

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Asteroseismology of three evolved stars in M67: testing systematic biases in seismic masses and ages

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

ABSTRACT Asteroseismology can precisely characterize stars, but the accuracy of seismic inference is still an open question. In this work, we use three evolved stars, including one late subgiant (EPIC 211411922) and two young red giants (EPIC 211409560 and EPIC 211416749) in the open cluster M67 to validate seismic inferences of stellar mass and age. We start by measuring oscillation mode frequencies and identifying acoustic and mixed modes in all three stars. We then fit the stars to determine their masses and ages with a detailed modelling approach. Our age estimates for all stars agree well with the literature consensus age range of M67 (3.0–5.0 Gyr). Mass estimates for EPIC 211411922 and EPIC 211409560 are sensible because they are slightly higher than the typical turn-off mass of the cluster. The inferred mass for EPIC 211416749 is underestimated by 5–10 per cent compared with the turn-off mass, but this could be caused by poor data quality. Our results indicate that the detailed modelling can determine sensible masses and ages for evolved stars near the base of the red giant branch.