Published in

Wiley, Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(14), p. 1623-1638, 2023

DOI: 10.1111/2041-210x.14112

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Improving ICESat‐2‐based boreal forest height estimation by a multivariate sample quality control approach

Journal article published in 2023 by Tianqi Zhang ORCID, Desheng Liu ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract Boreal forest heights are associated with global carbon stocks and energy budgets. The launch of the Advanced Topographic Laser Altimeter System (ATLAS) onboard the NASA's Ice, Cloud and Land Elevation Satellite (ICESat‐2) enables canopy vertical structure measurement at a global scale. However, with a photon‐counting laser system, ICESat‐2 contains high uncertainties in the estimated canopy heights, requiring appropriate quality control before being applied to canopy height modelling. We adopted a multivariate quality control approach (i.e. the Cook's distance) to improve the quality of ICESat‐2 samples. The controlled ICESat‐2 data were then input as the response variable for predicting boreal forest heights based on spatially continuous satellite data and machine learning (ML) regression models. The examined ML regressors include artificial neural networks (ANN), gradient boosting machine (GBM), random forest (RF) and support vector regression (SVR). The proposed quality control effectively removes low‐quality ICESat‐2 samples and enhances the correlations between ICESat‐2 and airborne laser scanning (ALS) observations. Moreover, the controlled ICESat‐2 samples help achieve a trade‐off between sample quality and quantity for all ML regressors, generating close canopy heights to ALS‐derived counterparts. Overall, RF and GBM make better canopy height predictions than ANN and SVR. Of all explanatory variables, the normalized difference vegetation index calculated based on the first red edge band of Sentinel‐2 (NDVIredEdge1) is considered the most important. The proposed quality control on ICESat‐2 sample selection and canopy height model (CHM) development workflow will greatly benefit forest structure investigations in the Arctic community.