Published in

Wiley Open Access, Journal of Diabetes, 11(15), p. 944-954, 2023

DOI: 10.1111/1753-0407.13449

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Effect of dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitor on the progression of coronary artery disease evaluated by computed tomography in patients receiving insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus

Journal article published in 2023 by Young Choi ORCID, Seung‐Hyun Ko, Kiyuk Chang, Ki Dong Yoo, Sang‐Hyun Ihm ORCID
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundWe evaluated the effect of a dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitor (DPP‐4i) on the progression of obstructive coronary artery disease (OCAD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) receiving insulin therapy.MethodsUsing a multicenter clinical data warehouse, we analyzed the patients receiving insulin therapy for T2DM who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for ≥2 times. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of DPP‐4i prescription between the two CCTA examinations. The prevalence of OCAD (>50% stenosis on CCTA), new revascularization rates, and changes in the coronary calcium score (CCS) were analyzed.ResultsA total of 623 patients were included, and a DPP‐4i was prescribed to 380 (60.9%) patients. The median time difference between the two CCTAs was 39.0 (17.0–61.4) months. Newly developed OCAD at the follow‐up CCTA was detected in 62 (16.3%) patients in the DPP‐4i group and 76 (31.3%) patients in the no DPP‐4i group (p < 0.001). The risk of new OCAD or new revascularization was lower in the DPP‐4i group (19.7% vs. 38.7%; p < 0.001). After propensity score matching, the prevalence of new OCAD (15.9% vs. 29.5%; p = 0.001) and the composite rate of new OCAD or new revascularization (18.7% vs. 37.3%; p < 0.001) were lower in the DPP‐4i group. The change in CCS per year did not differ significantly between the two groups (9.1 [0.1–56.8] vs. 13.5 [0.0–78.6]; p = 0.715).ConclusionsAdd‐on DPP‐4i therapy would be beneficial in preventing coronary artery disease progression in patients with T2DM receiving insulin therapy.