Carbonyl sulfide (COS) is a useful tracer to estimate gross primary production (GPP) because it shares part of the uptake pathway with CO2. COS is taken up in plants through hydrolysis, catalyzed by the enzyme carbonic anhydrase (CA), but is not released. The Simple Biosphere model version 4 (SiB4) simulates COS leaf uptake using a conductance approach. SiB4 applies the temperature response of the RuBisCo enzyme (used for photosynthesis) to simulate the COS leaf uptake, but the CA enzyme might respond differently to temperature. We introduce a new temperature response function for CA in SiB4, based on enzyme kinetics with an optimum temperature. Moreover, we determine Ball–Woodrow–Berry (BWB) model parameters for stomatal conductance (gs) using observation-based estimates of COS flux, GPP, and gs along with meteorological measurements in an evergreen needleleaf forest (ENF) and deciduous broadleaf forest (DBF). We find that CA has optimum temperatures of 20 ∘C (ENF) and 36 ∘C (DBF), which is lower than that of RuBisCo (45 ∘C), suggesting that canopy temperature changes can critically affect CA's catalyzation activity. Optimized values for the BWB offset parameter are similar to the original value (0.010 ± 0.003 mol m−2 s−1), and optimized values for the BWB slope parameter (ENF: 16.4, DBF: 11.4) are higher than the original value (9.0) at both sites. The optimization reduces prior errors on all parameters by more than 50 % at both stations. We apply the optimized gi and gs parameters in SiB4 site simulations, thereby improving the timing and peak of COS assimilation. In addition, we show that SiB4 underestimates the leaf humidity stress under conditions where high vapor pressure deficit (VPD) should limit gs in the afternoon, thereby overestimating gs. Furthermore, global COS biosphere sinks with optimized parameters show smaller COS uptake in regions where the air temperature is over 25 ∘C, mostly in the tropics, and larger uptake in regions where the temperature is below 25 ∘C. This change corresponds with reported deficiencies in the global COS fluxes, such as missing sinks at high latitudes and required sources in the tropics. Using our optimization and additional observations of COS uptake over various climate and plant types, we expect further improvements in global COS biosphere flux estimates.