Published in

MDPI, Diagnostics, 17(13), p. 2861, 2023

DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13172861

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Selective IgM Deficiency: Evidence, Controversies, and Gaps

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Selective Immunoglobulin M deficiency (SIgMD) has been recently included in the inborn errors of immunity (IEI) classification by the International Union of Immunological Societies Expert Committee. The understanding of SIgMD is still extremely limited, especially so in cases of SIgMD in the pediatric population. The epidemiology of SIgMD in the pediatric population is still unknown. The pathogenesis of SIgMD remains elusive, and thus far no genetic nor molecular basis has been clearly established as a definitive cause of this primary immunodeficiency. Recurrent respiratory infections represent the main clinical manifestations in children, followed by allergic and autoimmune diseases. No conclusive data on the correct therapeutic management of SIgMD are available. Although, for most SIgMD patients, Ig replacement therapy is not required, it may be recommended for patients with significantly associated antibody deficiency and recurrent or severe infections. Prophylactic antibiotics and the prompt treatment of febrile illness are crucial. There is insufficient evidence on the prognosis of this condition. Therefore, further studies are required to define the disease trajectories and to increase our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying SIgMD in order to facilitate a better clinical, immunological, and prognostic characterization of the condition and develop tailored therapeutic management strategies.