Published in

Wiley, Liver International, 6(43), p. 1225-1233, 2023

DOI: 10.1111/liv.15570

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Hepatitis C screening and detection program in a large population: Epidemiological transition and characterization of the disease

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionChronic hepatitis C (CHC) is considered an important public health challenge. Traditionally identified risk factors have undergone an epidemiological transition where other risk factors have become the main cause of new infections.ObjectiveTo describe risk factors associated to hepatitis C positivity through the evaluation of the epidemiological profile in hepatitis‐C high‐risk populations.MethodsCross‐sectional study was conducted as part of an HCV screening program in Mexican population. All participants answered an HCV risk‐factor questionnaire and took a rapid test (RT). All patients reactive to the test were subject to HCV PCR (polymerase chain reaction) confirmation. A logistic regression model was used to examine associations between HCV infection and risk factors.ResultsThe study included 297 631 participants that completed a risk factor questionnaire and underwent an HCV rapid test (RT). In total, 12 840 (4.5%) were reactive to RT and 9257 (3.2% of participants) were confirmed as positives by PCR test. Of these, 72.9% had at least one risk factor and 10.8% were in prison. Most common risk factors were history of acupuncture/tattooing/piercing (21%), intravenous drug use (15%) and high‐risk sexual practices (12%). Logistic regressions found that having at least one risk factor increased the probability of having an HCV‐positive result by 20% (OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.15–1.26), compared to the population without risk factors.ConclusionsWe identified 3.2% of HCV‐viremic subjects, all associated with risk factors and older age. Screening and diagnosis of HCV in high‐risk populations (including underserved populations) should be more efficient.