Published in

Public Library of Science, PLoS Genetics, 12(19), p. e1011086, 2023

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011086

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Combined analysis of transposable elements and structural variation in maize genomes reveals genome contraction outpaces expansion

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Structural differences between genomes are a major source of genetic variation that contributes to phenotypic differences. Transposable elements, mobile genetic sequences capable of increasing their copy number and propagating themselves within genomes, can generate structural variation. However, their repetitive nature makes it difficult to characterize fine-scale differences in their presence at specific positions, limiting our understanding of their impact on genome variation. Domesticated maize is a particularly good system for exploring the impact of transposable element proliferation as over 70% of the genome is annotated as transposable elements. High-quality transposable element annotations were recently generated for de novo genome assemblies of 26 diverse inbred maize lines. We generated base-pair resolved pairwise alignments between the B73 maize reference genome and the remaining 25 inbred maize line assemblies. From this data, we classified transposable elements as either shared or polymorphic in a given pairwise comparison. Our analysis uncovered substantial structural variation between lines, representing both simple and complex connections between TEs and structural variants. Putative insertions in SNP depleted regions, which represent recently diverged identity by state blocks, suggest some TE families may still be active. However, our analysis reveals that within these recently diverged genomic regions, deletions of transposable elements likely account for more structural variation events and base pairs than insertions. These deletions are often large structural variants containing multiple transposable elements. Combined, our results highlight how transposable elements contribute to structural variation and demonstrate that deletion events are a major contributor to genomic differences.