Published in

Elsevier, ACC Current Journal Review, 1(13), p. 11-12

DOI: 10.1016/j.accreview.2003.10.070

Elsevier, American Heart Journal, 3(146), p. 453-458, 2003

DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8703(03)00251-5

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Enhanced External Counterpulsation for the relief of angina in patients with diabetes: safety, efficacy and 1-year clinical outcomes.

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes are at greater risk for coronary events, yet they are less likely to benefit from revascularization than those without diabetes. Enhanced external counterpulsation has recently emerged as a treatment option for select patients with chronic stable angina. METHODS: We examined baseline characteristics, angina response, and cardiac outcomes of patients with diabetes mellitus treated with Enhanced External Counterpulsation (EECP) for chronic stable angina. Data were collected from patients enrolled in the International EECP Patient Registry (IEPR) before and after a course of EECP, and at 1 year after completion of treatment. RESULTS: Of 1532 IEPR patients studied, 43% had diabetes mellitus at baseline. Patients with diabetes were experiencing, on average, 11 episodes of angina per week. Most had been revascularized with prior percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (86%) and most were considered unsuitable for either additional procedure (87%). Treatment was completed as prescribed in 79% of patients (mean, 32 hours). Immediately after EECP, 69% of patients with diabetes demonstrated a reduction in angina of > or =1 Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class. After 1 year, maintenance of angina reduction was reported in 72% of patients with diabetes. Quality of life was significantly improved. Despite a high-risk profile among the diabetic group in this study, 1-year mortality was similar to coronary intervention registry populations. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that in select patients with diabetes, EECP can be a safe, effective, well-tolerated treatment option for the relief of angina.