Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Wiley, European Journal of Haematology, 1(83), p. 1-16, 2009

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2009.01243.x

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Laboratory diagnosis of the antiphospholipid syndrome: a plethora of obstacles to overcome

Journal article published in 2009 by Katrien Devreese, Marc F. Hoylaerts ORCID
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) is defined by two major elements: the presence in plasma of auto-antibodies, i.e. antiphospholipid antibodies and the occurrence of clinical features, categorised as vascular thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity. In contrast to recent reviews on the physiopathology of APS, the present review focuses on the laboratory diagnosis of APS. The original clinical and laboratory criteria that defined patients with APS were set in 1998 in the so-called Sapporo criteria. Although a revision of these criteria was published in 2006, a number of questions on the laboratory diagnosis of APS remain unresolved. The highlight in this review will therefore be on the potential and limitations of the detection of the lupus anticoagulant, as an established laboratory criterion for the diagnosis of APS. The strengths and weaknesses of the current laboratory guidelines are discussed against our current insight in the physiopathology of APS.