Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Annual Reviews, Annual Review of Immunology, 1(39), p. 791-817, 2021

DOI: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-102819-072601

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Decoding Cell Death: From a Veritable Library of Babel toVade Mecum?

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Programmed cell death (PCD) is a requisite feature of development and homeostasis but can also be indicative of infections, injuries, and pathologies. In concordance with these heterogeneous contexts, an array of disparate effector responses occur downstream of cell death and its clearance—spanning tissue morphogenesis, homeostatic turnover, host defense, active dampening of inflammation, and tissue repair. This raises a fundamental question of how a single contextually appropriate response ensues after an event of PCD. To explore how complex inputs may together tailor the specificity of the resulting effector response, here we consider ( a) the varying contexts during which different cell death modalities are observed, ( b) the nature of the information that can be passed on by cell corpses, and ( c) the ways by which efferocyte populations synthesize signals from dying cells with those from the surrounding microenvironment.