Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

American Association for Cancer Research, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 7(30), p. 1397-1407, 2021

DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-21-0055

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Tumor-Associated Stromal Cellular Density as a Predictor of Recurrence and Mortality in Breast Cancer: Results from Ethnically Diverse Study Populations

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: Tumor-associated stroma is comprised of fibroblasts, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), macrophages, endothelial cells, and other cells that interactively influence tumor progression through inflammation and wound repair. Although gene-expression signatures reflecting wound repair predict breast cancer survival, it is unclear whether combined density of tumor-associated stromal cells, a morphologic proxy for inflammation and wound repair signatures on routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections, is of prognostic relevance. Methods: By applying machine learning to digitized H&E-stained sections for 2,084 breast cancer patients from China (n = 596; 24–55 years), Poland (n = 810; 31–75 years), and the United States (n = 678; 55–78 years), we characterized tumor-associated stromal cellular density (SCD) as the percentage of tumor–stroma that is occupied by nucleated cells. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations between SCD and clinical outcomes [recurrence (China) and mortality (Poland and the United States)] were estimated using Cox proportional hazard regression, adjusted for clinical variables. Results: SCD was independently predictive of poor clinical outcomes in hormone receptor–positive (luminal) tumors from China [multivariable HR (95% CI)fourth(Q4) vs. first(Q1) quartile = 1.86 (1.06–3.26); Ptrend = 0.03], Poland [HR (95% CI)Q4 vs. Q1 = 1.80 (1.12–2.89); Ptrend = 0.01], and the United States [HR (95% CI)Q4 vs. Q1 = 2.42 (1.33–4.42); Ptrend = 0.002]. In general, SCD provided more prognostic information than most classic clinicopathologic factors, including grade, size, PR, HER2, IHC4, and TILs, predicting clinical outcomes irrespective of menopausal or lymph nodal status. SCD was not predictive of outcomes in hormone receptor–negative tumors. Conclusions: Our findings support the independent prognostic value of tumor-associated SCD among ethnically diverse luminal breast cancer patients. Impact: Assessment of tumor-associated SCD on standard H&E could help refine prognostic assessment and therapeutic decision making in luminal breast cancer.