Published in

Wiley, Advanced Materials Interfaces, 32(10), 2023

DOI: 10.1002/admi.202300602

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Hematite α‐Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>(0001) in Top and Side View: Resolving Long‐Standing Controversies about Its Surface Structure

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractHematite is a common iron oxide found in nature, and the α‐Fe2O3(0001) plane is prevalent on the nanomaterial utilized in photo‐ and electrocatalytic applications. The atomic‐scale structure of the surface remains controversial despite decades of study, partly because it depends on sample history as well as the preparation conditions. Here, a comprehensive study is performed using an arsenal of surface techniques (non‐contact atomic force microscopy, scanning tunneling microscopy, low‐energy electron diffraction, and X‐ray photoemission spectroscopy) complemented by analyses of the near surface region by high‐resolution transmission electron microscopy and electron energy loss spectroscopy. The results show that the so‐called “bi‐phase” termination forms even under highly oxidizing conditions; a (1 × 1) surface is only observed in the presence of impurities. Furthermore, it is shown that the biphase is actually a continuous layer distorted due to a mismatch with the subsurface layers, and thus not the proposed mixture of FeO(111) and α‐Fe2O3(0001) phases. Overall, the results show how combining surface and cross‐sectional imaging provides a full view that can be essential for understanding the role of the near‐surface region on oxide surface properties.