Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

American Thoracic Society, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 11(190), p. 1293-1300, 2014

DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201404-0718oc

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Clinical predictors of the respiratory arousal threshold in patients with obstructive sleep apnea

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Rationale: A low respiratory arousal threshold (ArTH) is one of several traits involved in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) pathogenesis and may be a therapeutic target; however, there is no simple way to identify patients without invasive measurements. Objectives: To determine the physiological determinates of the ArTH and develop a clinical tool that can identify patients with low ArTH. Methods: Anthropometric data were collected in 146 participants who underwent overnight polysomnography with an epiglottic catheter in order to measure the ArTH (nadir epiglottic pressure prior to arousal). The ArTH was measured from up to 20 NREM and REM respiratory events selected randomly. Multiple linear regression was used to determine the independent predictors of the ArTH. Logistic regression was used to develop a clinical scoring system. Measurements and Main Results: Nadir SpO2, apnea-hypopnea index and the fraction of events that were hypopneas (Fhypopneas) were independent predictors of the ArTH (r2=0.59, p<0.001). Using this information, we used ROC analysis and logistic regression to develop a clinical score to predict a low ArTH, which allocated a score of 1 to each criterion that was satisfied: (AHI<30 events/hr)+(nadir SpO2>82.5%)+(Fhypopneas>58.3%). A score of 2 or above correctly predicted a low arousal threshold in 84.1% of participants with a sensitivity of 80.4% and a specificity of 88.0%, a finding which was confirmed using leave-one-out cross validation analysis. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that individuals with a low ArTH can be identified from standard, clinically available variables. This finding could facilitate larger interventional studies targeting the ArTH.