Question addressed by the studyTo investigate exercise performance and hypoxia-related health effects in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) during a high-altitude sojourn.Patients and methodsIn a randomised crossover trial in stable (same therapy for >4 weeks) patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) with resting arterial oxygen tension (P_aO2) ≥7.3 kPa, we compared symptom-limited constant work-rate exercise test (CWRET) cycling time during a day-trip to 2500 m versus 470 m. Further outcomes were symptoms, oxygenation and echocardiography. For safety, patients with sustained hypoxaemia at altitude (peripheral oxygen saturation <80% for >30 min or <75% for >15 min) received oxygen therapy.Results28 PAH/CTEPH patients (n=15/n=13); 13 females; mean±sd age 63±15 years were included. After >3 h at 2500 m versus 470 m, CWRET-time was reduced to 17±11 versus 24±9 min (mean difference −6, 95% CI −10 to −3), corresponding to −27.6% (−41.1 to −14.1; p<0.001), but similar Borg dyspnoea scale. At altitude, P_aO2 was significantly lower (7.3±0.8 versus 10.4±1.5 kPa; mean difference −3.2 kPa, 95% CI −3.6 to −2.8 kPa), whereas heart rate and tricuspid regurgitation pressure gradient (TRPG) were higher (86±18 versus 71±16 beats·min⁻¹, mean difference 15 beats·min⁻¹, 95% CI 7 to 23 beats·min⁻¹) and 56±25 versus 40±15 mmHg (mean difference 17 mmHg, 95% CI 9 to 24 mmHg), respectively, and remained so until end-exercise (all p<0.001). The TRPG/cardiac output slope during exercise was similar at both altitudes. Overall, three (11%) out of 28 patients received oxygen at 2500 m due to hypoxaemia.ConclusionThis randomised crossover study showed that the majority of PH patients tolerate a day-trip to 2500 m well. At high versus low altitude, the mean exercise time was reduced, albeit with a high interindividual variability, and pulmonary artery pressure at rest and during exercise increased, but pressure–flow slope and dyspnoea were unchanged.