Published in

EDP Sciences, Astronomy & Astrophysics, (662), p. A25, 2022

DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142585

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

The magnetic topology of the inverse Evershed flow

Journal article published in 2022 by A. Prasad ORCID, M. Ranganathan ORCID, C. Beck ORCID, D. P. Choudhary ORCID, Q. Hu ORCID
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Context. The inverse Evershed flow (IEF) is a mass motion towards sunspots at chromospheric heights. Aims. We combined high-resolution observations of NOAA 12418 from the Dunn Solar Telescope and vector magnetic field measurements from the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) to determine the driver of the IEF. Methods. We derived chromospheric line-of-sight (LOS) velocities from spectra of Hα and Ca II IR. The HMI data were used in a non-force-free magnetic field extrapolation to track closed field lines near the sunspot in the active region. We determined their length and height, located their inner and outer foot points, and derived flow velocities along them. Results. The magnetic field lines related to the IEF reach on average a height of 3 megameter (Mm) over a length of 13 Mm. The inner (outer) foot points are located at 1.2 (1.9) sunspot radii. The average field strength difference ΔB between inner and outer foot points is +400 G. The temperature difference ΔT is anti-correlated with ΔB with an average value of −100 K. The pressure difference Δp is dominated by ΔB and is primarily positive with a driving force towards the inner foot points of 1.7 kPa on average. The velocities predicted from Δp reproduce the LOS velocities of 2–10 km s−1 with a square-root dependence. Conclusions. We find that the IEF is driven along magnetic field lines connecting network elements with the outer penumbra by a gas pressure difference that results from a difference in field strength as predicted by the classical siphon flow scenario.