Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

American Heart Association, Stroke, 7(53), p. 2346-2351, 2022

DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.121.036699

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Herniation World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies Scale Improves Prediction of Outcome in Patients With Poor-Grade Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Background: Favorable outcomes are seen in up to 50% of patients with World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) grade V aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Therefore, the usefulness of the current WFNS grading system for identifying the worst scenarios for clinical studies and for making treatment decisions is limited. We previously modified the WFNS scale by requiring positive signs of brain stem dysfunction to assign grade V. This study aimed to validate the new herniation WFNS grading system in an independent prospective cohort. Methods: We conducted an international prospective multicentre study in poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients comparing the WFNS classification with a modified version—the herniation WFNS scale (hWFNS). Here, only patients who showed positive signs of brain stem dysfunction (posturing, anisocoric, or bilateral dilated pupils) were assigned hWFNS grade V. Outcome was assessed by modified Rankin Scale score 6 months after hemorrhage. The primary end point was the difference in specificity of the WFNS and hWFNS grading with respect to poor outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score 4–6). Results: Of the 250 patients included, 237 reached the primary end point. Comparing the WFNS and hWFNS scale after neurological resuscitation, the specificity to predict poor outcome increased from 0.19 (WFNS) to 0.93 (hWFNS) (McNemar, P <0.001) whereas the sensitivity decreased from 0.88 to 0.37 ( P <0.001), and the positive predictive value from 61.9 to 88.3 (weighted generalized score statistic, P <0.001). For mortality, the specificity increased from 0.19 to 0.93 (McNemar, P <0.001), and the positive predictive value from 52.5 to 86.7 (weighted generalized score statistic, P <0.001). Conclusions: The identification of objective positive signs of brain stem dysfunction significantly improves the specificity and positive predictive value with respect to poor outcome in grade V patients. Therefore, a simple modification—presence of brain stem signs is required for grade V—should be added to the WFNS classification. Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02304328.