Published in

Wiley, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 11(24), p. 1257-1266, 2009

DOI: 10.1002/gps.2255

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

The association between different cognitive domains and age in a multi-centre study of middle-aged and older European men

Journal article published in 2009 by D. M. Lee, F. C. W. Wu, David M. Lee, Abdelouahid Tajar, T. W. O'Neill, Aslan Ulubaev, Neil Pendleton, F. F. Casanueva, Daryl B. O'Connor, Dirk Vanderschueren, Gyorgy Bartfai, I. T. Huhtaniemi, DM Tajar AA Ulubaev A Pendleton N O'Neill TW O'Connor D Bartfai G Boonen S Casanueva F Finn J Forti G Giwercman A Han T Huhtaniemi I Kula K Lean M Punab M Silman AJ Vanderschueren D Wu FCW NULL Lee, Steven Boonen, Frederick C. W. Wu and other authors.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We determined levels of cognitive functioning in community dwelling men aged 40-79 (n = 3265) from eight European centres and investigated to what extent cognitive performance varied between centres, the association between different cognitive domains and age, educational level, co-morbidity and lifestyle factors and the respective contributions of centre and individual factors to cognitive performance. METHODS: Cognitive domains assessed were visuo-constructional ability and visual memory (Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure test, ROCF), topographical memory (Camden Topographical Recognition Memory test, CTRM) and processing speed (Digit-Symbol Substitution test, DSST). RESULTS: There were significant between-centre differences in all four cognitive test scores. Using multilevel linear regression analysis (MLRA), age, education, depression, physical performance and smoking were independent predictors of cognitive function and these variables explained 10-13% of the variation in cognitive scores between centres and 17-36% of the variation in scores between individuals within centres. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that although a proportion of the variance in cognitive function among European men is explained by individual level differences, a significant proportion is due to contextual phenomenon. Such contextual factors need to be considered when analysing multi-centre data and European men should not be treated as homogeneous when assessing cognitive performance using existing instruments. Copyright (c) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. ; and the EMAS study groupThe EMAS Study Group: Florence (Gianni Forti, Luisa Petrone, Antonio Cilotti); Leuven (Dirk Vanderschueren, Steven Boonen, Herman Borghs); Lodz (Krzysztof Kula, Jolanta Slowikowska-Hilczer, Renata Walczak-Jedrzejowska); London (Ilpo Huhtaniemi); Malmo (Aleksander Giwercman); Manchester (Frederick Wu, Alan Silman, Neil Pendleton, Terence O'Neill, Joseph Finn, Philip Steer, Abdelouahid Tajar, David Lee, Stephen Pye); Santiago (Felipe Casanueva, Mary Lage); Szeged (Gyorgy Bartfai, Imre Foldesi, Imre Fejes); Tartu (Margus Punab, Paul Korrovitz); Turku (Min Jiang). Journal article