Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

American Academy of Neurology (AAN), Neurology, 19(98), p. e1902-e1912, 2022

DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000200194

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Epilepsy Surgery in Extratemporal vs Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Background and ObjectivesSeizure outcome after extratemporal lobe epilepsy (exTLE) surgery has often been poorer than after temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) surgery, but recent improvements in diagnostics and surgery may have changed this. Our aim was to analyze the changes in presurgical and surgical volumes and seizure outcome 2 years after surgery for patients with exTLE compared with those with TLE.MethodsWe performed a retrospective, single-center cohort study including patients from the Bethel presurgical-surgical-postsurgical database from 1990 to 2017. We used logistic regression to analyze factors influencing the odds for surgery and the odds for seizure freedom after surgery.ResultsWe included 3,822 patients with presurgical evaluation, 2,404 of whom had subsequently undergone surgery. The proportion of patients with exTLE in presurgical evaluation increased from 41% between 1990 and 1993 to 64% in 2014–2017. The odds for surgery decreased over time (2003–2011: odds ratio [OR] 0.50 [95% CI 0.36–0.70]; 2012–2017: OR 0.24 [CI 0.17–0.35]; reference: 1990–2002) and patients with exTLE had lower odds for surgery than patients with TLE, but this difference diminished over time (exTLE vs TLE 1990–2002: OR 0.14 [CI 0.09–0.20]; 2003–2011: OR 0.32 [CI 0.24–0.44]; 2012–2017: OR 0.46 [CI 0.34–0.63]). Etiology, the side of the epileptogenic lesion, and invasive recordings influenced the odds for surgery. The most frequent reasons for not undergoing surgery were missing identification of a circumscribed epileptogenic zone or an unacceptable risk of postsurgical deficits in patients with exTLE and the patient's decision in patients with TLE. Compared with patients with TLE, the odds for seizure freedom after surgery started lower for patients with exTLE in earlier years, but increased (≤2 lobes 1990–2002: OR 0.47 [CI 0.33–0.68]; 2003–2011: OR 0.62 [CI 0.44–0.87]; 2012–2017: OR 0.78 [CI 0.53–1.15]; ≥3 lobes 1990–2002: OR 0.37 [CI 0.22–0.62]; 2003–2011: OR 0.73 [CI 0.43–1.23]; 2012–2017: OR 1.46 [CI 0.91–2.42]). Etiology, age at surgery, and invasive recordings were further predictors for the odds for seizure freedom.DiscussionOver the past 28 years, the success of resective surgery for patients with exTLE has improved. At the same time, the number of patients with exTLE being evaluated for surgery increased, as well as their odds for undergoing surgery.