Published in

Karger Publishers, Pathobiology, 1(90), p. 1-12, 2022

DOI: 10.1159/000523751

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Impact of Region-of-Interest Size on Immune Profiling Using Multiplex Immunofluorescence Tyramide Signal Amplification for Paraffin-Embedded Tumor Tissues

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Representative regions of interest (ROIs) analysis from the whole slide images (WSI) are currently being used to study immune markers by multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) and single immunohistochemistry (IHC). However, the amount of area needed to be analyzed to be representative of the entire tumor in a WSI has not been defined. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We labeled tumor-associated immune cells by mIF and single IHC in separate cohorts of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) samples and we analyzed them as whole tumor area as well as using different number of ROIs to know how much area will be need to represent the entire tumor area. <b><i>Results:</i></b> For mIF using the InForm software and ROI of 0.33 mm<sup>2</sup> each, we observed that the cell density data from five randomly selected ROIs is enough to achieve, in 90% of our samples, more than 0.9 of Spearman correlation coefficient and for single IHC using ScanScope tool box from Aperio and ROIs of 1 mm<sup>2</sup> each, we found that the correlation value of more than 0.9 was achieved using 5 ROIs in a similar cohort. Additionally, we also observed that each cell phenotype in mIF influence differently the correlation between the areas analyzed by the ROIs and the WSI. Tumor tissue with high intratumor epithelial and immune cells phenotype, quality, and spatial distribution heterogeneity need more area analyzed to represent better the whole tumor area. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> We found that at minimum 1.65 mm<sup>2</sup> area is enough to represent the entire tumor areas in most of our NSCLC samples using mIF.