Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Oxford University Press, SLEEP, Supplement_1(45), p. A243-A244, 2022

DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsac079.550

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

0553 At-home Detection of REM Sleep Behavior Disorder using a Machine Learning Approach and Wrist Actigraphy

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Isolated rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) affects over 1% of middle-aged and older adults and is in most cases a prodromal stage of alpha-synucleinopathy. However, a small fraction of them is currently diagnosed due to poor access to the gold-standard diagnostic procedure polysomnography (PSG). We aimed to test an ambulatory diagnostic procedure for iRBD based on wrist actigraphy alone and combined with a short questionnaire on nonmotor symptoms. Methods A total of 35 PSG-confirmed iRBD and 28 age-matched clinic and community control participants with and without a sleep disorder (1:1 ratio) wore high-frequency (25 Hz) wrist actigraphy for at least 7 nights and completed sleep diaries. Raw accelerometer data recorded during sleep was analyzed by deriving an activity count and extracting movement-related features for each night. Additionally, participants completed the Innsbruck RBD inventory (RBD-I) and a 3-item questionnaire on hyposmia, constipation, and orthostasis. We fitted machine learning models, specifically, boosted decision trees, in a leave-one-out cross-validation framework to classify iRBD patients from controls based on either actigraphy or questionnaire data. For each participant, model predictions from actigraphy were averaged across all available nights. Results The boosted decision trees classified iRBD with an area under the receiver-operator-characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.972, a sensitivity of 97.1%, and a specificity of 89.3%. Analyses revealed that performance plateaued after one week of actigraphy. Best single feature “short immobile bursts” achieved an AUC of 0.958, a sensitivity of 94.3%, and a specificity of 78.6%. In this population, RBD-I item 3 best discriminated between groups with an AUC of 0.892, a sensitivity of 91.4%, and a specificity of 85.7%. The combination of a positive RBD-I item 3 and a positive actigraphy-based classification achieved a sensitivity of 88.6% and a specificity of 96.4%. Conclusion High-frequency actigraphy using machine learning detects iRBD with high accuracy. Addition of a single RBD question to this procedure increased specificity. These results need to be validated in a larger sample and lay the groundwork for an ambulatory screening paradigm in the general population. Support (If Any) The Klarman Family Foundation and the Feldman Foundation Ca.