Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Inter Research, Marine Ecology Progress Series, (693), p. 69-82, 2022

DOI: 10.3354/meps14089

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

The relative contribution of fleshy epiphytic macroalgae to the production of temperate maerl (rhodolith) beds

Journal article published in 2022 by Zn Qui-Minet, D. Davoult, J. Grall ORCID, S. Martin
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Published version: archiving restricted
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Maerl beds are composed of unattached red calcareous coralline algae. When located in shallow ecosystems, these calcareous macroalgae provide substrates for the development of fleshy epiphytic macroalgae, which contribute to the productivity of the maerl beds. To assess the importance of their contribution, we estimated the primary production of the main taxa of fleshy epiphytic macroalgae (Solieria chordalis or Rhodomelaceae), growing in 2 distinct Lithothamnion corallioides maerl beds in the Bay of Brest (Brittany, France), characterized by different depths and incident irradiances. We estimated epiphytic algal photosynthetic parameters derived from photosynthesis-irradiance curves calculated from incubations in photo-respirometry chambers at different irradiances and in the dark. A comparison with results previously obtained in L. corallioides showed that in the 2 studied maerl beds there were no differences between maerl and its fleshy epiphytic macroalgae in terms of photo-acclimation to low irradiances. However, fleshy epiphytic macroalgae had higher photosynthetic efficiencies and photosynthetic rates per unit of biomass or chlorophyll a than the maerl species. Estimations of net primary production per surface area of maerl bed indicated that fleshy epiphytic macroalgae account for 25% of maerl bed productivity. Interactions between L. corallioides and its fleshy epiphytic macroalgae may affect their respective contributions. In the deepest maerl beds, shading by fleshy epiphytic macroalgae may have a detrimental impact on L. corallioides net primary production, whereas in the shallowest maerl beds, fleshy epiphytic macroalgae may protect maerl from photoinhibition under high irradiances.