Published in

American Society of Clinical Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 16_suppl(40), p. e23507-e23507, 2022

DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.e23507

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Phase 2 trial of palbociclib and ganitumab in patients with relapsed Ewing sarcoma.

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

e23507 Background: Ewing sarcoma (EwS) is an aggressive sarcoma with few treatment options for patients with relapsed disease. CDK4 is a known genomic vulnerability in EwS, but an unappealing monotherapy target given propensity for innate resistance. In laboratory studies to identify targets synergistic with CDK4 inhibition, IGF-1R scored highly. We present the results of a phase 2 study combining palbociclib (CDK4/6 inhibitor) with ganitumab (IGF-1R monoclonal antibody) for patients with relapsed or refractory EwS. Methods: This was a prospective open-label, non-randomized, single-center, phase 2 study (NCT04129151) for patients with relapsed EwS and RECIST measurable disease. Patients with relapsed EwS ≥12 years and a documented fusion consistent with EwS were eligible. Patients initially received Palbociclib 125 mg on days 1-21 and ganitumab 18 mg/kg on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. The primary endpoints were objective response (complete or partial) per RECIST and toxicity by CTCAE. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A one-stage design required ≥4 responders out of 15 to evaluate an alternative hypothesis of 40% response rate against a null of 10%. Results: Ten evaluable patients enrolled between 5/2019-8/2021. The study closed 12/2021 due to lack of ganitumab drug supply. The median age at enrollment was 25.7 years (range 12.3-40.1; Table). The median duration of therapy was 2.5 months (range = 0.9-10.8). There were no complete or partial responders. Three of 10 patients had stable disease for > 4 cycles and 2 had stable disease at completion of planned therapy or study closure. 6-month PFS was 30±14.5%. Two patients had cycle 1 hematologic DLTs triggering the pre-defined toxicity rule; the palbociclib dose was subsequently reduced to 100 mg daily for 21 days. Among the remaining 8 patients, two had cycle 1 hematologic DLTs at the 100 mg dose. 80% of patients had grade 3/4 AEs; the most commons AEs were neutropenia (n = 8), white blood cell decreased (n = 7), and thrombocytopenia (n = 5). Total IGF-1 testing demonstrated intrapatient elevations in serum levels after a single cycle of therapy. Analysis of serial ctDNA samples is ongoing. Conclusions: Four responders out of 15 were required to reject the null hypothesis of a 10% response rate. With 0/10 responders, we concluded that this combination lacked adequate therapeutic activity for further study. The combination was tolerable at a palbociclib dose of 100 mg, with primarily hematologic toxicity in patients with relapsed EwS. Clinical trial information: NCT04129151. [Table: see text]