Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

EDP Sciences, Astronomy & Astrophysics, (664), p. A187, 2022

DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243930

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Dust emissivity in resolved spiral galaxies

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Context. The far-infrared (FIR) and sub-millimeter (submm) emissivity, ϵν, of the Milky Way (MW) cirrus is an important benchmark for dust grain models. Dust masses in other galaxies are generally derived from the FIR/submm using the emission properties of these MW-calibrated models. Aims. We seek to derive the FIR/submm ϵν in nine nearby spiral galaxies to check its compatibility with MW cirrus measurements. Methods. We obtained values of ϵν at 70–500 μm, using maps of dust emission from the Herschel satellite and of gas surface density from the THINGS and HERACLES surveys on a scale generally corresponding to 440 pc. We studied the variation of ϵν with the surface brightness ratio Iν(250 μm)/Iν(500 μm), a proxy for the intensity of the interstellar radiation field heating the dust. Results. We find that the average value of ϵν agrees with MW estimates for pixels sharing the same color as the cirrus, namely, for Iν(250 μm)/Iν(500 μm)=4.5. For Iν(250 μm)/Iν(500 μm)> 5, the measured emissivity is instead up to a factor ∼2 lower than predicted from MW dust models heated by stronger radiation fields. Regions with higher Iν(250 μm)/Iν(500 μm) are preferentially closer to the galactic center and have a higher overall (stellar+gas) surface density and molecular fraction. The results do not depend strongly on the adopted CO-to-molecular conversion factor and do not appear to be affected by the mixing of heating conditions. Conclusions. Our results confirm the validity of MW dust models at low density, but are at odds with predictions for grain evolution in higher density environments. If the lower-than-expected ϵν at high Iν(250 μm)/Iν(500 μm) is the result of intrinsic variations in the dust properties, it would imply an underestimation of the dust mass surface density of up to a factor ∼2 when using current dust models.