Published in

Elsevier, Atherosclerosis, 2(239), p. 295-298, 2015

DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.01.028

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Would raising the total cholesterol diagnostic cut-off from 7.5 mmol/L to 9.3 mmol/L improve detection rate of patients with monogenic familial hypercholesterolaemia?

Journal article published in 2015 by M. Futema, Meena Kumari ORCID, C. Boustred ORCID, M. Kivimaki ORCID, S. E. Humphries
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

A previous report suggested that 88 of individuals in the general population with total cholesterol (TC) > 9.3 mmol/L have familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH). We tested this hypothesis in a cohort of 4896 {UK} civil servants, mean (SD) age 44 (±6) years, using next generation sequencing to achieve a comprehensive genetic diagnosis. 25 (0.5) participants (mean age 49.2 years) had baseline TC > 9.3 mmol/L, and overall we found an FH-causing mutation in the {LDLR} gene in seven (28) subjects. The detection rate increased to 39 by excluding eight participants with triglyceride levels over 2.3 mmol/L, and reached 75 in those with TC > 10.4 mmol/L. By extrapolation, the detection rate would be ∼25 by including all participants with TC > 8.6 mmol/L (2.5 standard deviations from the mean). Based on the 1/500 {FH} frequency, 30 of all FH-cases in this cohort would be missed using the 9.3 mmol/L cut-off. Given that an overall detection rate of 25 is considered economically acceptable, these data suggest that a diagnostic {TC} cut-off of 8.6 mmol/L, rather than 9.3 mmol/L would be clinically useful for {FH} in the general population.