Published in

Wiley, BJU International, 5(93), p. 680-688, 2004

DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2003.04692.x

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Diagnosis of local recurrence after radical prostatectomy

Journal article published in 2004 by V. Scattoni, F. Montorsi, M. Picchio ORCID, M. Roscigno, A. Salonia, P. Rigatti, F. Fazio
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

In the long-term there is biochemical evidence of recurrent prostate carcinoma in approximately 40% of patients after radical prostatectomy (RP). Detecting the site of recurrence (local vs distant) is critical for defining the optimum treatment. Pathological and clinical variables, e.g. Gleason score, involvement of seminal vesicles or lymph nodes, margin status at surgery, and especially the timing and pattern of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence, may help to predict the site of relapse. Transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) of the prostatic fossa in association with TRUS-guided needle biopsy is considered more sensitive than a digital rectal examination for detecting local recurrence, especially if PSA levels are low. Although it cannot detect minimal tumour mass at very low PSA levels (