Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Indomethacin responsive headache syndromes : chronic paroxysmal hemicrania and Hemicrania continua : how they were discovered and what we have learned since

Journal article published in 2010 by Ottar Sjaastad, Maurice Vincent
This paper was not found in any repository; the policy of its publisher is unknown or unclear.
This paper was not found in any repository; the policy of its publisher is unknown or unclear.

Full text: Unavailable

Question mark in circle
Preprint: policy unknown
Question mark in circle
Postprint: policy unknown
Question mark in circle
Published version: policy unknown

Abstract

In the indomethacin responsive headaches (IRHs), chronic paroxysmal hemicrania (CPH) and Hemicrania continua (HC), the indomethacin (INDO) response is swift, absolute, and permanent, with moderate doses. Traditionally, CPH has been linked to cluster headache (CH) due to clinical similarities: unilaterality, intensity, and some autonomic phenomena. However, other clinical features differ essentially between these two headaches: sex ratio, mean attack frequency (CPH: 13.6 versus CH: 1.7 attacks/day), and duration of attacks. The therapeutic profile in CPH (indomethacin effect: ++; triptan effect: generally non-existent) is reversed in CH. The autonomic phenomena also differ clearly, a forehead supersensitivity sweating pattern and Horner-like pupil being present only in CH. The chronic/non-chronic stage ratio is 3.9 in CPH, against 0.14 in CH, a >25 times difference. Conversely, CPH and HC are very similar, clinically speaking. Accordingly, we should probably sever the link between CH and CPH and favour, instead, a linking together of CPH and HC, the two principal IRHs.